# Explore the textual-data literature database

Help me use this research prototype:

- Page: https://textdata.info/foundation/literature-reviews/
- Repository: https://github.com/joyzhzh/textdata/tree/main/appendix/02-literature

Read `README.md`, `docs/DATABASE_NOTES.md` and the relevant synthesis in `docs/annotation-methods.md` or `docs/workflow-literature.md`. Use `example/output/record-W026.json` to explain how the database separates article metadata, a reading note and limits on what was read. Explain why agreement between ratings is not automatically evidence of measurement accuracy.

Help me explore a small, relevant reading set using the webpage’s search and filters or `tool/query.py`. If working locally, run the documented offline check and show the query and actual results; otherwise say what you could inspect. Cite stable entry IDs and the papers’ DOI/URL links. Read the qualifications before drawing conclusions. Do not fill absent notes or abstracts with invented content.

Keep the repository’s 10,732-entry edition distinct from the webpage’s 10,731-entry edition. Entries overlap across catalogues; notes do not establish full-paper reading. Explain the completed prototype and two included syntheses separately from proposed extensions, and identify material evidence or reuse limits relevant to my question.

My research question or task: [describe it here]