Textual-data literature reviews and database

Research foundation

Methodological syntheses and a searchable database for text annotation, model comparison and annotation-workflow design.

Search the database

10,731 entries from overlapping catalogues, with 8,236 scholarly reading notes. Search, filter and open a record to distinguish source findings from interpretation and reading limits.

Search covers metadata and distinct words from available abstracts. Abstract prose is not displayed. Try “inter-rater reliability” or open the worked example.

The browser edition (31 October 2026) has 4,790 abstracts on file; 4,710 contribute to word search. The repository edition (29 October 2026) has 10,732 entries and 107 abstracts available. Both editions are downloadable below.

: annotation_checkpoint:W026, an entry with both an abstract and a reading note.

1–25 of 10,731 entries

Open a title to read its note and qualifications.

Literature records: title, authors, year, journal and the text held for each entry.
Title	Authors	Year	Journal	Held text
Annotation catalogue A · W001	Andreas Engelen; Julia Demmer‐Nolden; Verena Rieger; David Lohmar	2026	Journal of Product Innovation Management	Abstract

Annotation catalogue A · W002	Han Li; Feng Tian	2026	Group Decision and Negotiation	Abstract

Annotation catalogue A · W003	Yutian Wang; Luyao Zhang	2026	arXiv.org	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W004	Eddie Yang; Dashun Wang	2026	arXiv.org	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W005	Alessia Cantini; Andrea De Mauro	2026	Big Data and Cognitive Computing	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W006	Jacqueline N. Lane; Zoe Szajnfarber; Jason Crusan; Michael Menietti	2026	Strategic Management Journal	Abstract

Annotation catalogue A · W007	Elisabeth K. Gilbert; Joyce E. Bono; Lingshu Hu	2026	The Leadership Quarterly	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W008	Raven Adam; David Maier; M. L. Kogler	2026	arXiv.org	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W009	Linxin Hua; Xu Jia; Lirui Guo; Nan Zheng; Qingtan Shen; Dilang Tan; Ye Lu	2026	Research Square	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W010	Shijun Huang; Jieyu Hu	2026	IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management	Abstract

Annotation catalogue A · W011	YiBoon Chang	2026	The Korean Association of General Education	Abstract

Annotation catalogue A · W012	Siddharth Natarajan; Qingwei Li; Seung Ho Park	2026	Journal of International Business Studies	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W013	Chenghao Xing; Darian Low Eng Swee	2026	Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research	Abstract

Annotation catalogue A · W014	Shinjinee Chattopadhyay; Shinjae Won; Matthew Bidwell	2026	Academy of Management Journal	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W015	Tao Wang; Chi-Ching Juan	2026	arXiv.org	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W016	Feilian Xia; James Thewissen; Paul P. Momtaz; Shuo Yan	2026	Journal of Business Venturing	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W017	Erik Lang; Lasse B. Lien; Bram Timmermans	2026	SSRN Electronic Journal	Abstract

Annotation catalogue A · W018	Xiao-Ling Jin; Zedong Shen; Zhongyun Zhou	2026	International Journal of Information Management	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W019	Solomon Messing	2026	arXiv.org	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W020	Matthias Tröbinger; Anil R. Doshi; Sen Chai	2026	Research Policy	Abstract

Annotation catalogue A · W021	Albert Munoz; Mercedez Hinchcliff; Cameron Langfield; Ann Rogerson	2026	International Journal for Educational Integrity	Abstract

Annotation catalogue A · W022	Kumar Rahul; S. Chowdhury	2026	arXiv.org	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W023	L. Kong; Qianran Jin; Renyu Zhang	2026	arXiv.org	Metadata only

Annotation catalogue A · W024	Yuxuan Zhang; Boya Peng; Jing Wu	2026	Production and Operations Management	Abstract

Annotation catalogue A · W025	Marcus Becker; Timo Zimmermann; Judith Maria Beermann	2026	Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal	Abstract

Download the browser edition

All entries without abstract text, CSV, compressed (3.6 MB)
All entries without abstract text, JSON, compressed (3.7 MB)
Edition counts and theme patterns, JSON (3 KB)

10,731 entries: the same records as the browser, without abstract prose.

Download the repository edition

Repository edition, CSV, compressed (3.6 MB)
Repository edition, JSON, compressed (3.7 MB)
Repository-edition counts, JSON

10,732 entries: the files in repository folder 02-literature. Abstract prose is omitted in both editions.

Read the AI prompt

# Explore the textual-data literature database

Help me use this research prototype:

- Page: https://textdata.info/foundation/literature-reviews/
- Repository: https://github.com/joyzhzh/textdata/tree/main/appendix/02-literature

Read `README.md`, `docs/DATABASE_NOTES.md` and the relevant synthesis in `docs/annotation-methods.md` or `docs/workflow-literature.md`. Use `example/output/record-W026.json` to explain how the database separates article metadata, a reading note and limits on what was read. Explain why agreement between ratings is not automatically evidence of measurement accuracy.

Help me explore a small, relevant reading set using the webpage’s search and filters or `tool/query.py`. If working locally, run the documented offline check and show the query and actual results; otherwise say what you could inspect. Cite stable entry IDs and the papers’ DOI/URL links. Read the qualifications before drawing conclusions. Do not fill absent notes or abstracts with invented content.

Keep the repository’s 10,732-entry edition distinct from the webpage’s 10,731-entry edition. Entries overlap across catalogues; notes do not establish full-paper reading. Explain the completed prototype and two included syntheses separately from proposed extensions, and identify material evidence or reuse limits relevant to my question.

My research question or task: [describe it here]

Open the literature appendix

What the abstracts show

How many of the 4,732 abstracts used in this table mention five themes, before 2023 and from 2023 on.

Entries with an abstract on file that mention each theme
Theme	All	Before 2023	From 2023
Language models	4149%	4<1%	35821%
Text analysis	3097%	1114%	17510%
Annotation and coding	2305%	863%	1277%
Reliability	3407%	1887%	1328%
Narratives	1483%	602%	785%

Out of 4,732: 2,884 dated before 2023, 1,707 from 2023 on and 141 without a year. This aggregate basis is wider than the searchable entries. Counts of source entries, not distinct papers; a theme is matched by a word pattern, listed in the counts download.

Read the syntheses

Three syntheses, two included. Read them here or download their Markdown files.

How the collected papers annotate text and test multiple models
20 October 2026 · 7 sections
A comparison of the methods reported in seven collected papers and three saved supplements.
Markdown(16 KB)
Contents
Contents
Back to the syntheses
Annotation-workflow design: sensitivity, repeatability and evaluation
20 October 2026 · 3 sections
An assessment of eight sources on sensitivity, repeatability, evaluation against a reference and downstream inference.
Markdown(8 KB)
Contents
Contents
Back to the syntheses
Third synthesis
Not included in this edition.

What has been built

Three methodological syntheses and a searchable database. Review materials include two syntheses and 10,732 entries from overlapping catalogues. Records distinguish source metadata from project notes.

What comes next

Extend the reviews and enrich records with source links and qualified reading notes.

Limits

Entries overlap across catalogues. A reading note may reflect metadata, an abstract or selected passages; it does not establish full-paper reading.
Search covers metadata and abstract words, not reading notes or abstract prose. Abstract coverage is uneven; sources without established sharing permission are omitted from word search and theme counts.
These are scoped syntheses, not systematic reviews. The papers’ results have not been independently reproduced, and the notes have not all been checked against the original papers.
Further syntheses, abstract coverage and reading notes are proposed development.

Metadata come from Crossref, OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, Google Scholar and publishers’ pages, and the abstracts on file (not shown) mostly from saved OpenAlex captures, also Crossref, Semantic Scholar, PubMed and publishers’ pages; syntheses rendered with Marked (MIT licence).